Columns In 1988, climatologist James Hansen announced, “Global warming has arrived.”
Now, 34 years later, it is painfully obvious that climate catastrophes have arrived.
Featuring scenes that have become more and more routine in recent years, summer in the northern hemisphere saw extreme heat and wildfires in many places, as well as torrential rains and colossal floods that washed away the products of human settlement in others. The worst hit by the latter, beginning in June, was Pakistan, where an agonizing humanitarian disaster put a third of the country under water and displaced 33 million people out of a population of 230 million.
At least 1,500 people died as a direct result of the flooding, including hundreds of children. Some 180 healthcare facilities were so damaged that they no longer function, leaving many desperate people without access to basic care for themselves and their families.
It’s hard to wrap one’s mind around the disaster, one that will continue to cause suffering in the South Asian nation through things like agricultural losses and water-borne diseases after the waters begin to recede. Pakistan is the country with the most glaciers below the arctic circle, which logically will contribute to morphing an annual fresh melt-water blessing into a curse.
Pakistan is eighth in terms of the climate disaster impacts it has already felt and risks it faces. Showing how unfairly this emergency is likely to play out, the country is estimated to contribute less than one percent of world carbon emissions.
This crisis is not merely happening, it is accelerating.
Many celebrated pundits fill column inches and on-air time with calls for a new cold war with China to go along with ongoing hostilities in Ukraine, where negotiations seem ever less likely as Western and Russian arms manufacturers gleefully count their profits. None seem to connect the ravages of carbon emission-driven climate chaos with the massive carbon footprint of war and even preparing for war.
