Primary elections are a routine occasion of frustration for many Americans. The recent primary elections continued this trend. Central questions included ideas about the amount of power still wielded by Donald Trump, whether the accomplishments of the Biden administration have been promoted enough, and can election results be trusted?
Many pundits point to Trump-endorsed Harriet Hageman defeating Rep. Liz Cheney as more proof that Trump is in control of the Republican party. Ten Republicans in the House of Representatives voted to impeach Donald Trump for inciting the Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021; four retired rather than face reelection, four lost to Trump-backed opponents — including Camas-Washougal residents’ congressional representative, Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler — and two advanced to the general election.
This requires a critical analysis. Let’s look at a few elements.
Results from a 2019 Civic Science survey helps to articulate the complicated mess that uncritical analysis creates. The survey revealed troubling information about how bias and prejudice problematize political decision making.
For example, 56% of respondents said that schools in America shouldn’t teach Arabic numerals (which, as every school child should know, are the numerals we all use every day and throughout American education, e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4). While they do not claim that this indicates a stunning level of both ignorance and commitment to purblind prejudice, that should be quite obvious.
We’ve all seen the uproar over critical race theory, which at its core is simply a commitment to teach pupils the truth about American history. The truth is what students need. They can decide for themselves what they believe to be good, great, bad or evil. But Fox News and Republicans call for a ban on such teaching.