Recent press reports reveal that Camas-Washougal Economic Development Association (CWEDA) Director Paul Dennis was recently investigated by the Camas Police Department for financial impropriety. Specifically, he is suspected of using $15,000 of public funds for personal expenses. Camas police have referred the case to the Clark County District Attorney with a recommendation for prosecution.
Local guardians of the public trust who created CWEDA reacted sympathetically to recent revelations of financial impropriety at CWEDA. David Ripp, Port of Camas-Washougal chief executive officer, expressed his surprise, disappointment and frustration. Washougal Mayor Molly Coston, an enthusiastic early proponent of CWEDA, said she was disappointed and saddened by the results of the police investigation. Former Camas Mayor Scott Higgins, also present as a Camas city councilman at the creation of CWEDA, emphasized CWEDA’s accomplishments and shared a personal story that suggested he knew that the CWEDA director managed his own finances sloppily.
How did we get here? The history of CWEDA’s founding provides some insight.
In early 2011, then-Port of Camas-Washougal Commissioner Mark Lampton and Ripp proposed at a joint meeting of the Port commissioners and Camas and Washougal city councilmembers a three-way partnership in the creation of an economic development agency. There was much enthusiasm. Two Washougal City Council members however, Jon Russell and myself, objected to the haste, ill-defined structure and lack of performance standards to measure organizational effectiveness of the proposed entity. Our objections were trampled in the stampede to establish CWEDA and select Dennis, then the mayor of Camas, to head the organization.
Dennis, approaching the end of his second term as Camas mayor, was cleared by Camas contract legal counsel who saw no conflict of interest in the Dennis being picked for the post created by the consortium that included his city, so long as he resigned as mayor before taking the new position. He did.
Port sponsors stressed the necessity of haste without providing a good rationale. Efforts by CWEDA and its supporters to answer some of our objections produced fig-leaf measures to buttress CWEDA’s poorly substantiated claims of success.