Any bond increase should be used for police, fire, infrastructure, schools, etc.
Matt Pacione,
Camas
Readers respond to an editorial published in the Oct. 24, 2019 Post-Record:
Hello, My name is Phillip Williams and I’m a resident of Camas, I’ve had to explain this Camas election cycle to neighbors who weren’t following along, as well as friends and family outside of our wonderful town. One of the things I’ve marveled at again and again is how the larger idea of national politics has not entered the conversation about the $78m pool bond. Some of the folks involved in this issue have gone very low in the conversation, but again, as low as they’d go, they wouldn’t cross that line. I’ve been so hopeful that, regardless of national party affiliation, we start the day after this election off fresh with such a strong piece of common ground on the NO side of this argument, to forge long lasting connections beyond larger politics – similar to those that have been through a battle together because unfortunately, that’s what this has been. I’ve met “NO on the Pool Bond” voters from every different band of the rainbow. Many have talked to me as if they understood I was 100% in agreement with their larger political views and that just hasn’t always been true, but again, we identify so strongly on why this pool is a bad idea for Camas and that has been IMPORTANT enough for people to make that leap and connect with another human being on a fundamental level. The only person that did cross that line to date however, and more than once, has been Kelly Moyer, managing editor of the Camas-Washougal Post-Record. Kelly has decided to play fast and loose with our lives here in Camas. I don’t know that Kelly lives in Camas and I don’t care because in or out, she has shown herself to be an unethical journalist and in my opinion from her raw thoughts in these editorials, a person that would not hesitate to incite extreme individuals among us to action in these especially elevated times. It’s my opinion that Kelly Moyer has used the Camas-Washougal Post-Record as her own personal tool to sew hatred and division in a town she has no presence in that I’ve seen – outside of reprinting the city government’s press releases with a little of her own “excitement” thrown in. I’m advising all of my neighbors to consider cancelling your subscriptions unless Scott Campbell, owner and publisher of the paper, can show Camas that this was a mistake and print FRONT PAGE retractions with an apology to the citizens of Camas. Kelly has crossed that line and Camas deserves a better managed newspaper. Thank you.
Phillip Williams,
Camas
I just read your article on the Camas Pool Bond in the Opinion section online. Had this been a Letter to the Editor rather than being written by the Managing Editor it could have been viewed as one citizen’s opinion which every citizen is entitled to express. Since it was written by the Managing Editor it is tragically flawed in its blindness to the facts and its apparent lack of seeking them out. A read of the Next Door posts would have provided some understanding, let alone reaching out to a few citizens for input.
The psychological method of “discounting” the legitimate views of residents who oppose the bond measure is disturbing. Rationale citizens who evaluate financial expenditures consciously and practically are rightfully outraged at the lack of due diligence and fiscal responsibility demonstrated in putting forth this ill-conceived bond measure. A public apology is indeed in order, as is an article presenting the legitimate concerns of Camas citizens.
Sincerely,
Jeanne McKirchy-Spencer,
Camas
Hello,
My name is Carolyn Kjerting and I’m a resident of Camas.
I write to you today, because I am of the belief that Kelly Moyer, managing editor of the Camas-Washougal Post-Record has shown herself to be an unethical journalist. Her recent C/W Post Editorial Opinion 10/24/19 – ‘Trumpian Tactics in Community Center Fight’ is simply appalling. This is not journalism! If Kelly were a citizen writing in, and the paper published it, that would be one thing. But the fact that she would go against all journalistic integrity and write this biased, ignorant piece of propaganda is despicable. Journalists have the obligation to ask questions, investigate, review actual data, look at all sides of an issue, and put forth a researched and factual summary. None of this is evident in her post. The title itself is a blatant attempt to insight anger and stoke the fire. What does Trump have to do with this first of all, and secondly, I can tell you that the No on Proposition 2 folks represent all sides of the dice. If Kelly had bothered to do one ounce of research at all, she would know that this issue has brought together folks of differing political affiliations, wide ranging socio-economic groups, religious differences, and individuals from varying ethnic backgrounds, to agree on something that will impact us all regardless of our differences. I am opposed to Proposition 2, have been vocal and organizing to raise awareness and I’m a flipping tree hugging liberal that is as far from Trumpian as you can get! I suspect you will be inundated with folks that are infuriated by Kelly’s bias, her sloppy work and the news outlet for allowing it to go to print and digital distribution channels.