One of the first things you learn in any decent journalism degree program is that journalists, whether they work for a national television outlet or a tiny community newspaper, must operate according to the Journalists Code of Ethics.
There are a few biggies in this written code. For instance, ethical journalists should:
- Seek the truth and be accurate, honest and fair in their reporting;
- Minimize harm, which covers a lot of ground but basically means be a decent human being and show compassion; and
- Act independently, which covers everything from paying sources (do not even think about it), disclosing conflicts of interest and not giving advertisers favored treatment to labelling sponsored content and “shunning hybrids that blur the lines between news and advertising.”
One of the rules in the code of ethics that sometimes gets lost in the deadline frenzy is the rule stating journalists must “be accountable and transparent … and explain ethical choices and processes to audiences.”
That’s the rule this editorial would like to address.
In our March 7, 2019 issue, we ran a front page story about a recent cluster of police incidents involving Camas High School students. The story generated an incredible amount of discussion online, and we’ve heard administrators at Camas High have been getting a number of phone calls and emails with questions citing this article.
After one administrator implied we had approached this issue with malice — “to inflame the community” as they wrote to Camas High staff in an email sent to us by an anonymous member of the community — we thought it best to describe the process behind this article.
First, let’s dispel any notion that we covered this issue to inflame the community.