There seems to be an influx of business leaders and developers crying out for more room at the table in local government meetings, lately.
Last month, it was land developers, who felt left out of a two-year planning process regarding a proposed urban tree program in the city of Camas. This week, it was business leaders who said a volunteer committee charged with reviewing Camas’ form of government hadn’t done enough to reach out to them or to educate the community.
In both cases, the business sector asked local government leaders to halt their decisions.
The Camas Planning Commission did just that, returning a proposal — one that was based on two years’ worth of research, meetings, consultant reports, staff time, volunteer committee member input and field trips to meet with urban tree experts in other Washington communities — and asking city staff to do a better job reaching out to the upset developers.
And at a June 4 Camas City Council meeting, council members said nothing after corporate leaders, including Ken Fisher, founder of Fisher Investments, the city’s largest private sector employer, told them they were effectively waging war against private employers like him if they dared vote on a proposal to send a form of government question to voters in November.
Government leaders obviously have a responsibility to consider all possible pitfalls when weighing a decision, but should they be bending so far to please private business interests?