Inside a newsroom, even the smallest election is enough to generate excitement. We’ve usually spent time with the candidates, maybe sat down with them over cups of coffee, so we are, at the very least, interested in the outcome. Besides, we’re witnessing democracy in action, right?
The trouble is, with voter turnout rates hovering around 25 percent for local elections and 55 percent for presidential elections, the results aren’t actually representing the “will of the people.”
Instead, when voter turnout rates are low, the election usually reflects the will of older, wealthier, whiter residents and neglects the needs of anyone younger than 50, people of color and lower-income folks. In fact, an October of 2016 Portland State University study found that residents age 65 and older are 15 times more likely than residents between the ages of 18 and 34 to vote in local elections.
Many people shrug this off and think maybe “those other people” are just too apathetic to vote, but there are many systemic forces in place that keep certain segments of our population from casting their vote.
This year, the Cooperative Congressional Election Study discovered that, in the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections, early registration deadlines were the single biggest contributor to low voter turnout. Other studies have shown dramatic increases in turnout among younger voters, low-income populations and people of color when states automatically register voters instead of implementing prohibitively early voter registration deadlines. In neighboring Oregon, for example, the number of non-white voters nearly doubled after that state implemented automatic registration and did away with early registration deadlines.