C-TRAN issues should be discussed openly
The Post-Record story of April 5, “Camas and Washougal councils weigh in on C-TRAN measures” highlighted the need for more open local government.
Both cities are represented on the CTRAN board by Camas City Councilor Linda Dietzman. At the April 5 Washougal City Council meeting, a CTRAN resolution vote was held. It seemed sneaky since two council members had excused absences. The vote could have been scheduled the following week to include the full council.
Washougal Councilmember Greenlee wrote a resolution passed by the partial council, “We believe that the interests of Washougal are best served by the experienced and prudent representation of Council member Dietzman,….We therefore will depend on our representative’s expertise, in the issue of for what, whether and when, C-TRAN will seek voter approval for sales tax levies.” Council members Greenlee, Coston and Morris voted for it.
To substitute the opinion of the C-TRAN representative for that of the full Washougal Council reduces public discussion of public transportation and cuts out the citizen voice of elected city councilors. On April 5, the Camas Mayor removed C-TRAN discussion from the published council agenda and no votes were taken at all.
The fact Camas and Washougal have a representative on C-TRAN is no reason to abdicate responsibility to discuss transportation by the full councils with votes. In Bellevue, the city council has a transportation representative and still vigorously debates and votes on transportation issues. Potential conflicts of interest on light rail routes and hot topics are discussed out in the open where they belong.