Unhappy with actions of C-Tran board
In 2004, the C-Tran district was county-wide, every Clark County citizen had a vote, and a C-Tran sales tax rate hike measure failed.
In January 2005, the C-Tran board responded by gerrymandering the C-Tran boundary to a smaller district that excludes tens of thousands of county voters. All county residents now pay the C-Tran sales tax, but only those who live in the gerrymandered C-Tran district have a vote, taxation without representation.
C-Tran recycled the sales tax hike measure in the September 2005 low-turnout primary election. Voila! The boundary downsize paid off in millions of dollars more annually for C-Tran to serve fewer residents.
In 2011, C-Tran held another public vote in this gerrymandered district to raise taxes to “preserve our buses” and C-Van. Citizens warned that C-Tran funds would be diverted to light rail. C-Tran countered in the ballot measure “fact” piece that funds would not pay for light rail. Furthermore, policy(PBD-015) against using C-Tran tax funds for light rail was updated with fanfare in August 2011 to persuade voters to support the tax hike, which passed in November 2011.
In 2012, C-Tran held a vote on high capacity transit light rail and bus rapid transit (BRT). Every city in Clark County, and the county area allowed to vote rejected the ballot proposition.